Privateer Discord频道中的历史QA

来源：战舰世界Privateer（私掠者） Discord QA频道
翻译：MegaHarlequin
本文部分内容曾发布于NGA玩家社区，如需转载请通过首页邮箱联系我们

Q：Khabarovsk. Is it the Project 24 armored DL from the 30s (not the BB from the 50s), or a varient of Pr. 47 as most people think?
Q：哈巴罗夫斯克到底是20世纪30年代的24型装甲驱逐领舰(不是50年代的战列舰计划)，还是像大部分人以为的47型驱逐领舰的变种之一？

A：Khabarovsk is a combination of Project 24 and Project 47.
A：哈巴罗夫斯克是24型和47型的混合体。

Q：Vasteras. Is it possible to share the documentation or blueprints?
Q：有没有可能和大家分享一下韦斯特罗斯的资料或者设计图？

A：Unfortunately, we cannot give you any documents or blueprints we were using during the development of the ship. However, you can check the information about it in a series of Polish magazines «Niszczyciele typu Grom, Błyskawica».
A：对不起，我们不能给出我们开发这艘船时用的任何资料和图纸。但是你可以从一些波兰杂志《驱逐舰雷电、闪电 (Niszczyciele typu Grom, Błyskawica)》上获得一些信息。

Q：Mikoyan/Kotovsky. Is it possible to share the documentation on these ships?
Q：有没有可能和大家分享一下米高扬和科托夫斯基的资料或者设计图？

A：Unfortunately, we cannot share any documentation or blueprints about Mikoyan and Kotovsky. But we suggest you to check information about the pre-project of Project 26 on the Internet. These cruisers were designed on the basis of this pre-project.
A：对不起，我们不能分享任何关于米高扬和科托夫斯基的资料和图纸。但我们建议大家在网上查询26型巡洋舰的早期计划。这两艘巡洋舰就是基于这个早期计划设计出来的。

Q：Champagne/Henri IV: Any information on the 240mm/55 or 406mm/50 that can be shared?
Q：有没有什么可以分享的关于香槟的406mm/50主炮和亨利四世的240mm/55主炮的信息？

A：Unfortunately, we cannot give you any information about the guns of Henri IV, because we designed these guns ourselves. As for Champagne guns, they have a real prototype. These guns were produced by the Shneider company on request of USSR.
A：对不起，我们不能给出亨利四世主炮的任何信息，因为这炮是我们自己设计的。至于香槟的主炮，法国人有真实的原型。这些火炮由施耐德公司按苏联要求制造。

Q：Shikishima is claimed to be A150, yet it keeps the superfiring 155mm secondaries despite the common understanding being that these would also have been swapped for 10cm/65 guns as well. Was new information found by WG in the design of this ship, or was this change made for other reasons, or is the common understanding of this design incorrect?
Q：你们声称敷岛是A150计划，但其仍保留着背负式155mm副炮，而不是人们普遍认为的被替换为10cm/65火炮。是不是WG在设计这艘船的时候发现了新的信息？还是说处于其他原因进行了改动？或者说公众对这个计划的普遍认识是错的？

A：The ship’s design is not entirely based on the A150 project. Her concept was mainly developed by WG teams. The plan was to give Yamato a higher caliber guns (so to say “Super Yamato”) with some other minor adjustments.
A：敷岛的设计不完全基于A150计划。她的概念主要由WG团队构思。这个计划是给大和装备更大口径的主炮(所谓“超大和”)以及其他一些小改动。

Q：Still Shikishima: was a shielded mount for the 40mm Type 5 mount actually designed or is this a WG creation? If it was designed, is it possible to share?
Q：依然关于敷岛：带有炮盾的5式40mm防空炮是否真的存在？还是说又是WG制造？如果真实存在，能不能分享一下图纸？

A：These mounts were entirely created by us. We were thinking about AA mounts suitable particularly for the Super Yamato concept, which could be protected from explosions and other damage. Thus, these mounts were designed.
A：这些防空炮完全由我们设计。当时我们构思了能够提供爆炸和其他伤害保护，适合超大和概念的防空炮。于是这座炮就设计了出来。

Q：Georgia/Ohio: To the best of my knowledge (or any of the numerous US BB design histories), the 18″/48 twin was not planned for Iowa Scheme IV or a Montana-like hull. Was new information found pertaining to these ships or is it simply a gameplay focused change?
Q：据我所知(在众多的美国战列舰设计中)，双联装18″/48炮从来没有计划安装在衣阿华4号原案或者蒙大拿级船体上。是否发现了与这些舰船有关的新信息，或者仅仅是出于游戏性的改变？

A：This change was made for gameplay and balance reasons.
A：这一改变是出于游戏性和平衡性原因。

Q：Is it possible to share detailed blueprints or information about Pr. 84 (Nevsky)? The general characteristics and profile of the ship is known, but the armor scheme isn’t.
Q：有没有可能和大家分享一下84型巡洋舰(亚历山大·涅夫斯基)的设计图或者信息？我们知道这个计划的基本数据和资料，但是不知道她的装甲结构。

A：As far as we know, there are almost no blueprints and schemes of Project 84. Project works were stopped in 1955 and cancelled in 1956. By far we only have several documents, some of which may not be entirely historical.
As for armor layout schemes, they were designed by WG team, so, unfortunately, we cannot share any information about it.
A：据我们所知，84型巡洋舰基本上没有图纸。这个计划在1955年停止并在1956年取消。我们目前只有一点资料，其中一些可能还不完全是历史的。
至于装甲布局，这是由WG团队设计的，所以对不起，我们不能分享关于它的任何信息。

Q：Odin: This ship is generally believed to be a WG design. Is there any actual design history about this ship that the community does not know about?
Q：大家普遍认为奥丁是WG设计的船。那到底有没有社群所不知道的关于这艘船的史实设计资料？

A：Odin was designed as one of the possible preliminary variants of a Scharnhorst type battleship (or battlecruiser). The hull is almost the same as of Scharnhorst type battleships, but main guns have a higher caliber, diesel engines and different secondaries. All in all, Odin is a pre-Scharnhorst with diesel engines and 305 mm guns.
As for detailed blueprints or schemes we used, unfortunately, we cannot share them with you.
A：奥丁是作为沙恩霍斯特级战列舰(或战列巡洋舰)可能的初期方案之一被设计出来的。她的船体基本上与沙恩霍斯特级战列舰一致，但有着更大口径的主炮、柴油主机和不同的副炮。总而言之，奥丁是一艘拥有柴油主机和305mm主炮的“前沙恩霍斯特”。
至于我们使用的细节图纸和设计，对不起，不能和大家分享。

Q：Paolo Emilio: Little is known about the claimed project UP 39. Is any information available to share or is this also a WG original design?
Q：我们对保罗·埃米利奥所称的UP39计划所知甚少。有没有可以分享的信息？还是说这也是WG原创设计？

A：Paolo Emilio was based on the project of armored leader-destroyer offered by Italian company Ansaldo to USSR. The blueprints and documentation we used are stored in the Russian state archive of the Navy in Saint Petersburg. Besides, there were many adjustments made and our own ideas used when designing in-game concept of the ship from our side, so Paolo Emilio doesn’t entirely resemble what is described in the official documentation. Unfortunately, we cannot share any documentation or blueprints with you.
A：保罗·埃米利奥是基于意大利安萨尔多公司向苏联提供的装甲驱逐领舰计划设计的。我们使用的图纸和资料保存在圣彼得堡的俄罗斯海军国家档案馆里。此外，我们这边在设计这艘船的游戏内概念时做了很多改动，也想了很多我们自己的想法，所以保罗·埃米利奥并不完全像官方资料里描述的那样。而我们也不能和大家分享任何资料或图纸。

Q：Venezia’s hull is curiously close to the specs of one of the 3×3 254mm gun large cruiser designs sold to Russia in 1936 by Ansaldo. Displacement is similar (~22,000 tons), as is the propulsion plant and top speed (240,000 shp for 37 knots). Dimensions look to be similar too. Is Venezia a heavily modified version a 254mm large cruisers with a radically different armament, or is this just coincidence?
Q：威尼斯的船体与安萨尔多公司1936年卖给苏联的3×3 254mm主炮大型巡洋舰方案之一出奇相像。排水量也接近(大约22000吨)，动力系统和最高航速(240000轴马力，37节)也很接近。舰体尺寸看起来也很相似。所以说威尼斯是不是经过重度改装，使用完全不同武备的254mm大巡？还是说这只是巧合？

A：Venezia’s design is, in our perspective, a possible development of Italian heavy cruisers (which stopped developing after cruise Bolzano in 1933). She combines Ansaldo projects offered to Spanish Navy and various features from different light cruisers (Giuseppe Garibaldi и Luigi di Savoia Duca degli Abruzzi, Capitani Romani) and battleships (Roma and etc.). All in all, Venezia is a complete papership.
A：在我们看来，威尼斯的设计是意大利重巡洋舰的可能发展方向(实际上在1933年波尔扎诺号巡洋舰之后就没再发展过)。她结合了安萨尔多公司提供给希腊海军的计划和各种不同的轻巡洋舰(朱塞佩·加里波第、阿布鲁齐公爵、罗马统帅)和战列舰(罗马等)的特色。总而言之，威尼斯完全是一艘WG设计的船。

Q：With the remodelling of the US DD line, will Black get her correct bridge structure? she did not have the round bridge like Fletcher, rather the angled bridge.
Q：随着美国驱逐舰线的重新建模，布莱克会不会获得她正确的舰桥？她的舰桥不是弗莱彻那样的圆形舰桥，而是带有棱角的。（译注：布莱克为弗莱彻后期型，其舰桥外形可见游戏中的基德、忠武）

A：everything possible in our world，nothing impossible
A：我们的世界中一切皆有可能，没有什么是不可能的

Q：Pyotr Bagration. She is a variation of Pr.65, but there is no version I could find that comes even remotely close to her weaponry and protection at the same time (closest is III-A, but that lacks a pair of 100mm guns and only has 2/3 the armor). Are you able/allowed to shine some light on this one?
Q：彼得·巴格拉季昂。她是65计划的一个变种，但是我找不到一个甚至是一点点同时符合她的武备和防护的版本(最接近的是III-A方案，但其缺少两座100mm火炮且仅有前者2/3的装甲)。你能不能或被不被允许和我们说明一下巴格拉季昂的事情？

A：Actually, Pyotr Bagration is not related to Project 65. She is based on operational and tactical plan prepared by the General staff of the USSR Navy in 1945. The plan, apart from other projects, included cruisers with 180-mm main guns (this was found in in the Central archive of the Navy in Gatchina, so we cannot share this documentation with you). Pyotr Bagration is a variation of such cruisers, which has rapid firing 180 mm main guns, good armor and decent AA. Main targets of such cruisers were light cruisers. However, the project of such cruisers was rejected soon, because it was decided to focus more on other heavy cruisers and light cruisers. Thus, the project of 180 mm guns cruiser was stopped and cancelled, without even having its own number assigned.
A：实际上，彼得·巴格拉季昂和65计划没有关系。她是基于1945年苏联海军将官们制定的作战及战术计划。除去其他项目，本计划包括了搭载180mm主炮的巡洋舰(我们在加特契纳中央海军档案馆里发现了这份资料，所以无法与你们分享)。彼得·巴格拉季昂就是这类巡洋舰的一个变种，搭载有速射180mm主炮、良好的装甲和不错的AA。本类巡洋舰的主要目标为轻巡洋舰。但是由于苏联海军决定更多地关注其他重型巡洋舰和轻巡洋舰，这类巡洋舰的计划很快就被否决了。因此，180mm火炮巡洋舰的计划被停止和取消，甚至没有分配到自己的编号。

Q：Ägir. The hull matches that of the O-class, but the armament doesn’t match. Is this change based on documents that are not as available as others or was this a gameplay driven change?
Q：埃吉尔。她的船体和O级一样，但武器却不一样。这种改动是不是基于那些普通人无法获得的资料？还是由游戏玩法所驱？

A：Ägir is, in fact, Siegfried, which was based on really existing project of battle cruisers of O-class. But Agir has a different armaments. The change was based on game design requests, however, her guns exist in reality (305-mm SK C/39 http://www.navweaps.com/Weapons/WNGER_12-56_skc39.php)
A：实际上，埃吉尔和齐格飞一样是基于真实存在的O级战列巡洋舰计划。但是埃吉尔有着不同的武器。这个改动是基于游戏设计要求，不过她的火炮历史上真实存在（305-mm SK C/39）。

Q：Ludendorff/Pommern. Her hull is that of H-39, but those turrets are nowhere to be found. Again the question if it is possible to shine some light here.
Q：鲁登道夫/波美拉尼亚。 她的船体和H-39一样，但是我却哪都找不到那些炮塔。所以问一下有没有可能再给点线索？

A：Pommern is really a variation of H-39 battleships. Her guns are the same as on Bismark type battleships (380-mm SK C/34 – http://www.navweaps.com/Weapons/WNGER_15-52_skc34.php), But for them, our designers calculated and designed three-guns turrets which didn’t exist in reality.
A：波美拉尼亚确确实实是H-39型战列舰的一个方案。她的火炮与俾斯麦级所使用的为同一型号（380-mm SK C/34），但是，三联装炮塔是由我们的设计师计算和设计的，在现实中并不存在。